Alaska GOP’s Old Chair is Everything the New Chair is Not– Qualified and Connected

From my friend and fellow Republican Andrew Halcro

“Thank you for your time this morning. You’ve been the worst audience I’ve ever spoken to.”

Andrew Halcro addressing the Alaska Republican Convention 4/28/12


May 1, 2012: There is that age old axiom that goes a little something like this; be careful of what you wish for because you might just get it. The Ron Paul devotees, who were successful in their second attempt to seize control of the Alaska Republican Party (ARP) this past weekend, should pay close attention.

After experiencing first hand (not nearly as bad as Sen. Murkowski & Barasso) the extreme rudeness and general cluelessness of the new wave of Republican partiers, it makes me rest just a little bit easy knowing they won’t be going very far.

Capitalizing on the perfect mixture of disenfranchised Ron Paul presidential campaign supporters and Tea Party activists, the tide turned on Saturday when the election of a new ARP Chairman ushered in an era of uncertainty.

“It’s reminiscent of when the Moral Majority took over in the eighties,” a longtime Republican leader told me on the condition of anonymity.

It is hard to believe it had been four years since the last time the Ron Paul faithful tried to gain control of the ARP. During the state convention back in 2008 their attempt to oust Party Chairman Randy Ruedrich was denied by their lack of understanding party rules and their inability to piece together a coalition beyond legalizing marijuana and repealing the Patriot Act.

This year they were more organized, they were more vocal and they were more rude.

With Ruedrich deciding not to seek another term, the power vacuum was filled by so called anti-establishment Republicans, who have long felt their ideas; beliefs and contributions have gone unappreciated. “This was a case of being seduced on an emotional level, not a practical level,” I was told by a veteran Republican.

In the end, sixty six year old Russ Millette, an avid Ron Paul supporter whom very few Republicans know, was elected the new ARP party chairman. Millette apparently knows very little about the party and more importantly, the candidates or the donors. This doesn’t bode well for the strength of the party.

For the last decade under Ruedrich, the ARP has thrived. Making gains in both in voter registration and statewide organization, Ruedrich was able to maintain the uneasy alliance between business and social conservatives. He was incredibly efficient in recruiting strong candidates, planning strategy and keeping the coffers full. Even those who have harshly criticized him, including myself, do it with clear recognition the guy knows how to win.

Ruedrich is everything Millette is not, qualified and connected.

The passion of the Paul

Ron Paul has become more of a cult than a candidate since he first burst on the scene back in 2008. His followers are passionate about Paul’s isolationist position regarding everything from free trade to foreign policy and his libertarian views on social issues. But even given his impressive ability to reach younger demographics along with staunch older conservatives, it hasn’t delivered him a single primary victory.

The challenge ahead for the ARP under Millette’s leadership is he is going to need leaders who have victories under their belts and know how to win the tough races, because 2014 is going to be a barn burner. In two years both the governor’s seat and a U.S. Senate seat are up for grabs. Ruedrich was more than battle tested before he became party chair.

Paul supporters certainly have the capacity to spur a philosophical revolt, but they don’t have the capacity to build and finance the ARP and its candidates.

According to ARP rules, Millette won’t ascend to the chairmanship until January 2013. During the next eight months, Millette will be given a seat on the party finance committee and will be responsible for helping raise money for the party…not Ron Paul. This is going to prove interesting, as Millette has reportedly said that raising money for Paul was going to be his primary mission.

Ahead of Saturday’s election, in an attempt to avoid any ideas a new chairman might have for the for the cash the ARP had on hand, party officials transferred $100,000 into an account controlled by the Capitol City Republicans Women’s Club. This means the party starts with bare cupboards as Millette takes his seat on the finance committee and a general election just six months away.

But even with the election of Millette, the new wave of passionate Paul fever and the chaotic weekend of Republican speakers being treated rudely, these folks have done little more than make the ARP completely irrelevant.

You ain’t so big now, are ya?

For a political party to remain relevant they must have resources, especially money. With the all the appearance that the state GOP just imploded and now rests in the hands of untested rebels, donors have other places to park their cash instead of with the ARP.

With the Citizens United decision by the United States Supreme Court, donors are no longer restricted to contributing solely through the traditional party structure. Individuals, organizations even companies can now donate directly to Super PACs, or other third party groups designed to funnel money to candidates or advertise on their behalf as allowed by law. So while candidates will still get their donations in the form of cash donations and supportive third party ads, the old school party structure is what will be starved.

A perfect example of the vast power of third party efforts is Alaska’s U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski’s 2010 general election write in victory over GOP nominee Joe Miller. Murkowski had no party support and yet with the aide of third party groups and bi-partisan volunteers, pulled off the greatest political comeback in modern history.

The bottom line is with the new campaign finance laws; political parties as a fundraising source have given up the higher ground to third party groups.

These groups are more focused, have lower overhead and can offer significant support without any ideological litmus tests that often burden party endorsements.

As a result of the Alaska GOP’s meltdown this past weekend, some are anticipating the flight of donations past the ARP to new groups designed to support Alaskan candidates directly.

This weekend’s chaotic party transition has some lawmakers worrying about relying on party funding due to the upheaval. When there is a lack of certainty in politics, there is lack of certainty in fundraising.

While Paul supporters may have won the battle, it remains to be seen if they will actually win their long running anti-establishment war. The core of the ARP, the Central Committee, is still in tact to help keep things balanced.

Read More


12 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Robert Buchanan
    May 01, 2012 @ 18:10:59

    Syrin, you simply don’t have your facts straight and I don’t believe you were even at that convention. It was Palin who attempted to oust Randy in 2008. Palin was very open about it afterwards and was suprised the Randy was still in charge.

    In 2008 the Palinistas (including Joe Miller) created a much worse disruption that anything that happened during this convention. BTW, I don’t recall Joe Miller being in the Paul camp in 2008. In 2008 Miller was a Palin supporter not a Paul supporter.

    At the 2010 convention a group from the valley, which included a number of Paul delegates from 2008, supported Edna as challenger to Randy. The proportion of Paul supporters in 2010 was just as high as in 2008. (The convention was smaller.)

    BTW, the “Old Guard” wasn’t ousted at this convention it largely stepped aside. Randy and Steve didn’t run. I think Randy has wanted to retire from office for several years. He is the longest serving state chariman and the position is unpaid and often more than full time. It is a pretty thankless job.

    None of the three people running had anything like Randy’s skills or connections. The fact that we will have an inexperienced chair isn’t the fault of the Paul supporters. That is simply what happens when an old chair retires.


    • Syrin
      May 01, 2012 @ 21:33:50

      The only real mention of 08 convention was making the point in reply to a comment on another post. I said Joe Miller showed how well he can create havoc and dissension, so I expected the worst. Nothing was said about his support of Ron Paul in 08, that I can remember. Oh I’m sure Sarah was part of it! I was caring for my mom who had. Triple bypass in o8 during convention. Indeed, I wasn’t there, no regret! But, lots of people I know were there. And, what did we do? We elected Captian Zero as Governor.. Thank you Robert for your comment.


  2. Trackback: The Last Man Standing… « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
  3. WakeUpAmerica
    May 01, 2012 @ 20:41:38

    Ok, being a liberal California gal, I have nothing for this post. I’m going to take a seat and watch this one from the sidelines.


    • Syrin
      May 01, 2012 @ 21:09:46

      Thanks for stayin in touch! That’s all that I can do, be on the sidelines. Could you imagine if your state Democrat party structure was taken over by any one of the fringe groups to be able to funnel funds to one candidate?


      • WakeUpAmerica
        May 02, 2012 @ 04:24:52

        I would be outraged and protesting in the street. Of course, the weather is nicer for protesting here. LOL

  4. Syrin
    May 01, 2012 @ 21:04:32

    Please go read more! He’s saying the same thing I am, but much better.

    The Alaska State GOP will be left with a captain at the helm who has no leadership skills, no institutional knowledge of key player, donors or advisors and the only thing they’ll have…is a mouth piece to support candidates.


  5. Robert Buchanan
    May 01, 2012 @ 21:31:21

    Syrin, we don’t yet know very much about the Russell’s abilities. Randy will be a hard act to follow, but that would have also been true for Judy or Bruce. If you wanted a different outcome, you should have been more active influencing the process.


    • Syrin
      May 01, 2012 @ 21:48:41

      Inexperience and connections can be overcome with a willing membership Maybe the difference with the other candidates for chair is that they are not completely influenced and motivated to be nothing but a Ron Paul fund raiser. As the chair of a state party you just support Republicans! It doesnt matter who they support or supported for president in past elections! More active influencing the process? I’m a worker bee, I’m very active behind the scenes. This was completely out of my hands, Sir!


  6. mgardener
    May 02, 2012 @ 03:38:45

    How can you be a republican ?
    What do you support in their name?


  7. maddiesmom24
    May 02, 2012 @ 08:13:33

    I’m with mgardener – I don’t get you guys…


  8. Maple
    May 02, 2012 @ 11:30:59

    It sounds as though an ARP chairman with no experience, no connections (and probably no education) might be a very good thing for the Alaska Democratic party!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Syrin From Wasilla’s Stats

%d bloggers like this: