Is Palin’s wild political ride over?


Quite frankly there’s only so much time for politics coverage, and so much time for the “freak show” coverage that Palin used to dominate.

Last week’s Wall Street Journal/NBC poll showing Sarah Palin’s mere 25 percent “positive” rating among all respondents has pundits wondering whether she is yesterday’s news, despite her continued Fox News presence and frequent Twitter posts. Steve Kornacki of Salon says there’s no point in speculating about her intent in the 2012 GOP presidential contest and it probably doesn’t matter much anymore. It’s hard to look back at the last six months and pinpoint one precise moment when the bottom fell out for Palin. … But at some point recently, she stopped simply being a polarizing lightning rod — one with as many fanatical followers as diehard critics — and transformed into a figure who even Republican-leaning voters have a hard time taking seriously.  David Weigel of Slate thinks seeming GOP presidential candidates Donald Trump and Michele Bachmann are upstaging Palin for media attention at this point.  Quite frankly there’s only so much time for politics coverage, and so much time for the “freak show” coverage that Palin used to dominate. That time is now being occupied by Donald Trump’s journey of birtheristic self-discovery and the not-a-joke Bachmann campaign. But Jonathan Bernstein of The Washington Post advises against assuming she’s a goner. The truth is that Palin remains the only real first-tier presidential candidate the Republicans have – the only candidate who has been on a national ticket. Should she decide to run an active campaign, she would likely recover a good bit of the ground she has lost, just by repositioning herself as a real politician and abandoning her current incarnation as a reality TV star. It’s still not too late for her to give a series of serious policy speeches; not too late for her to put together a real campaign staff; not too late for her to crisscross Iowa and New Hampshire; and not too late, certainly, for her to raise tons of money for a campaign. Tony Lee of Human Events says Palin is still a contender, giving his “top 10 reasons” she will run for president. And Paul Waldman of The American Prospect reminds liberals that there will be another presidential election in 2016. After all, back in 1962, no one thought that creepy, sweaty Dick Nixon could ever win a public office again, either.


3 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. suz1941
    Apr 13, 2011 @ 19:33:11

    Because she was on the ticket in 2008 makes her a top tier contender if she decides to run? Doesn’t anyone there check the facts, the truth anymore? I suppose not. She was a joke on that ticket, not vetted, but used. She is not knowledgeable and should never been on the ticket in the first place. Since then she quit her job as governor and so far has made a gazillion dollars giving canned speeches to dwindling crowds. She’s a liar and a scam artist. Is that what the Republican party considers top tier? Heaven help them.


  2. Dis Gusted
    Apr 13, 2011 @ 20:27:18

    the GOP has dropped her like the hot potato she is. Her only skills are she is an accomplished liar. It’s possible she is also a thief that skipped out on paying property taxes, and used materials from the sports complex she forced on Wasilla to remodel her home. Remember…the sports complex that she had built on land the town didn’t own? The same complex that left the town in debt by $20 million…..

    She had a massage when she was allegedly seven months pregnant by Todd’s hooker friend – she said she wasn’t pregnant. She didn’t look pregnant and she laid on her stomach so her cellulite could be massaged.

    She used her tubal ligation as an excuse repeatedly when it was her turn to car pool right after Piper was born.

    So many lies….unnecessary lies. We don’t need cheats like Todd and Sarah Palin in office ANYWHERE. They were both members of AIP although they will lie and deny it.

    Top tier?? Bwahahaha…. if so, the GOP has fallen much further than anyone could imagine.


  3. eva marie
    Apr 14, 2011 @ 04:24:36

    The Kennedy Nixon debate was in 1960 not 1962. There were no debates or campaigning in 62.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Syrin From Wasilla’s Stats

%d bloggers like this: